Have you’ll seen the Dirt Time in Alaska episodes 10, 11, and 12?  They were filmed in Fairbanks back in Spring of 2006 on the Chena River.

The three-day training workshop had one-day classroom instruction and two days with actual hands-on implementation.  It was sponsored by the USFWS to help landowners whom were having problems with accelerated shoreline erosion along the Chena River. A very proactive landowner, Jeff Harrison,  provided his property for the demonstration, equipment rental, and he purchased some of the materials. I got to operate a nice little John Deere Excavator which was a treat.

A few Erosion Control Manufacturers contributed to help making a Dirt Time episode. See /the-episodes/ . The class was based on the Environmentally-Sensitive Streambank Techniques outlined in recently published NCHRP Report 544.

The Lower Chena River is almost like a lake so the erosional forces at work involve wave action, primarily from the riverboats operating in the spring and summer, and to a lesser degree, ice from the spring breakup. Compounding the problem is urban development which had resulted in removal of the natural riprian vegetation.

The techniques we chose for the hands-on repair were:

1. Cori Rolls w/ Brushlayering

2. Live Siltation w/ Coir ‘BioD Blocks’

3. Vegetated Rock Protection

4. ‘Deltalok’ Vegetated Geoberm Bags

 See below Photos of Riverboat waves flowing perpendicular to shore!

About 40 people attended the workshop, including members of USFWS, AK Department of Fish and Game, Alaska Department of Conservation, and USACE.  It was a wonderful spring day to work, in fact sunburn was a risk.  Most of the techniques we demonstrated could be constructed by hand labor but we did utilize the excavator to build a relatively-stable toe/terrace (dictated by water surface elevation at the time) on which to start the coir and soil bag constructions.  The Coir Rolls (and Bio D Blocks)  and the Soil Bags were designed to be the “structural elements” which will resist wave splash erosion.  The backfill with brushlayering  was intended to provide the gravity and reinforced (with branches, roots, coir tiebacks etc.) soil fill.  The Live Siltation is a “modified brush layer” which have the branches slanting upward more – designed to provide roughness during high water.   

A problem we encountered was something I had never considered – seasonal permafrost. The wooden anchors needed for the Coir constructions could only be driven in about a foot before hitting complete and total resistence. By the end of the summer, the permafrost will have melted even more and the stakes are simply driven into mud! We decided to double up on the wooden stakes but the structural integrity really came from the brushlayering, tiebacks and the gravity of the fill.

The Vegetated Soil Bags were geotextile bags filled with granular soil and organic (compost) matter. The patented element of this product is an approximately 4″ x 8″ heavy duty plastic plate with spiked on each side – intended to keep the bags from slipping when stacked upon each other. Again, we used willow brushlayering between each lift.



Interestingly, several years ago I heard rumors that these methods failed in the first year! Needless to say I was disappointed but hoped that the professionals in the area could look at the big picture and beneficially incorporate some of these techniques into more ‘rigid’ designs as needed.

However, I recently received a current photo of the site and GUESS WHAT? The streambank and the project, including the techniques, have performed magnificently! I don’t know how the rumors got started but the photos below show how well the site has performed. I called Jeff Harrison the other night and he verified that all the techniques we tried, with the exception of LWD anchored down with duckbills, have performed great! He reports that he had some 6-9″ rock left and placed it in a few places. He commented that in hind-sight, he would have “battered the coir walls back a bit” and while the soil bags have also “held up great but they are not as attractive.”

Picture below is of our partner in Dirt Time – James Swirsky filming an episode.

(More on James in Footnote)

See the site photos taken 7 years later, July 16, 2013. Jeff reports that the willows have formed a hedge which he prunes. You can see in the closeups where he deposited some rock. Just think, after 7 years of wave splash and weather!! A disclaimer – Jeff reports that there has not been a huge ice breakup in several years but nothing can defend against that!

Photos below were taken on July 16, 2013!

Footnote: James and I went on to film even MORE Dirt Time Episodes.

James Swirsky and Lisanne Pajot won a Sundance Film Festival Award for their Documentary film, Indie Game: The Movie in 2012!

Check it out at https://buy.indiegamethemovie.com.

And for more information on Our Chena River Bioengineering Project and Dirt Time episodes, please check us out on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WatchYourDirtTV

And visit our store at: https://watchyourdirt.bigcartel.com/

Thanks for reading!

John

Redding California and it is Fall of 2000.  SWAG (Sacramento Watersheds Action Group) a non-profit formed in 1996 to restore the salmonid habitat in Sulphur Creek (an important (spawning and rearing habitat-wise) a seasonal urban stream, has started to “Day Light” the Secret Canyon Stream.

Our Sulphur Creek Watershed Analysis and Action Plan (1998) documented the work needed in the watershed – and if this old Road Crossing (circa 1938) failed it could fill Sulphur Creek with even more sediment and compromise the “in stream” restoration work that SWAG was doing.

As Project Manager for SWAG I wrote a grant request for $15,000 from CA Department of Water Resources Urban Stream Program.  However, I had badly under estimated the extent of the earthmoving work needed and the permit and planning with the City of Redding was also costly and unanticipated.  Secret Canyon was “filled-in” back in 1938 to build the Shasta Dam Conveyor Belt and now 60 years later the 36” culvert was rotted and over 10,000 CY of fill was threatening to blow out.

 Fig. 1- The Conveyor Belt over North Market Street, circa 1938.  Secret Canyon is to the rear, behind telegraph pole.  The sign says “The World Longest Conveyor Belt” used to transport over 3 million CY of rock, 11 miles, to build Shasta Dam!!

Fig 2 – View of failing culvert before “daylighting” began.

Fortunately SWAG had the support of the Sulphur Creek CRMP and Turtle Bay Museum and we had MOU agreements with Shasta College to do much of the work as part of our work site-learning program – this project was “tailor-made” for our Heavy Equipment Operations Class and my Watershed Restoration Class.   Thankfully John Livingston (HE Operation Instructor) and my self had some dedicated student who just wanted to operate bulldozers and RESTORE the land – these students worked faithfully for over 10 days, 10 hours per day, just “pushing dirt”.  Chris Cross, a local Trinity County Contractor donated lots of hours on a huge PC 400 Excavator.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Then my class and community volunteers performed the erosion control work using native grasses, native straw mulch, bioengineering, and planting native container plants provided by Turtle Bay Museum and Arboretum.

Fig 5 Community Planting days helped

instill watershed stewardship

Fig 6  The “New Daylighted Stream” is treated

with bioengineering techniques like fiber rolls,

brushlayering of willow and elderberry and cottonwood.


Figure 8  The over 10,000 CY removed from the

channel was placed back on the hill cut from which it came. 

Land recontouring is an affective restoration tool. 

See Landforming by H. Schor and D. Gray

One of the coolest bioengineering techniques is the “Live Smile”.  I learned this one from a very experienced “Bioengineer and Teacher” David Polster, from Vancouver Island, BC.  David showed my how willow branches can be constructed as a woven fence but shaped as a catenary curve.  This shape is extremely strong and David has used them successfully to stabilize slumping shallow slope failures.  Below are pictures of David’s Live Smiles that I took up in BC.  Well, our fill that was placed steeply (1.5:1 and dozer compacted) had some shallow failures during the first winters heavy rains.  Our Shasta College class stabilized the slumping areas with Live Smiles.

Figure 12 Students installing Live Smile to retail small slumps on steep fill slope

What is really amazing is that the Live Smiles have continued to grow and provide stability after 14 years!  That is 13 very HOT, dry Redding summers!!  These willows are far removed from a stream or a spring or …  so just remember in the future when considering Salix sp. As an upland restoration plant!  As David Polster so eloquently points out is his treatise about how our restoration goals should include Successional Reclamation concepts – willow is a successional reclamation plant, it is a pioneer species in many regions coming in initially after fire, landslides etc., holds the soil in place with its fibrous roots, then “gives up” the now stabile ground as successional species take over.  An important concept indeed!

This project and many more are available in our NEWLY-Published ‘Bioengineering Case Studies’, 2014, W. Goldsmith, D. Gray, J. McCullah

Please let us know if you like these blogs.  You can subscribe or just let me know and I’ll put you on (or keep you on) my mailing list.

Happy New Year

– John

Hey! Hey! Hey! A new book is soon to be out and we want you to be the first to catch up on it!

Bioengineering Case Studies: “Sustainable Stream Bank and Slope Stabilization” presents a range of well-documented case studies on key techniques and best practices for bio-stabilization projects. John McCullah (from here at Dirt Time and Salix Applied Earthcare, Redding, CA) has teamed up with Wendi Goldsmith (Bioengineering Group, Salem, MA) and Donald Gray (The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) to bring you the best of the best!  

This book offers abundant visual detail, featuring four to five high-quality photographs for each project, totaling nearly 150 images! Bioengineering Case Studies is an ideal book for civil and environmental engineers and environmental scientists working on watershed, infrastructure projects, and municipal scale installations.

Please visit, springer.com for ordering information including more details !!!

Thank you for your support and enthusiasm on our new book!

We would love to hear your thoughts and any kind of feed back!

Thank you,

The Dirt Time Team

Good News from Large Places! We are pleased to announce that us here at Dirt Time, have teamed up with IECA (Internation Erosion Control Association) offering Dirt Time Webinars! Earn 1 PDH per most videos today!

 

Here is a message from IECA’s Education Director, Jimmy Eanes, CPESC, CESSWI:

 

We are excited to be able to offer the Dirt Time videos in our online course offerings. The masterful work of John McCullah in using video to teach basic and advanced methodology of Erosion & Sediment Control is some of the best in the industry. We hope our members and soon-to-be members will avail themselves of this content. Thanks to Dirt Time for allowing IECA to add these educational tools to its library.

 

For more information on registering for a Dirt Time Webinar click here for more details!

We are offering 5 full length videos as listed below:

 

Pricing: $50 USD per PDH credit!

 

 

 
Any questions/more information, please feel free to e-mail us at info@salixaec.com

 

 

We have hit the mainstream sites with a bang! Check out our page on Facebook today for more updated information on what we are doing, current projects, videos, contests and more!!! If Twitter is more your thing, you can follow us there too!!!

Our Facebook Page: www.Facebook.com/WatchYourDirtTV

Don’t forget to “Like” our page so you don’t miss out on what’s going on with us at Dirt Time!

Even more catching up with us at Twitter: https://twitter.com/DirtTime

 

 

 

Hi All,
I got some great comments and questions from the last Blog upload.  Some were asking for “the point” to be made clear.  Unfortunately we didn’t post the actual paper written for and presented at the IECA Annual Conference in 2010.  Here is the entire paper as presented.
The SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS are that 4000 lbs/ac of the most commonly used Hydromulches did NOT inhibit the germination or establishment of three types of native grasses – as tested up in Northern California.  In fact, at 2000 lbs/ac rate we observed (did not measure it as that was beyond the scope of the trials) erosion on the slope, less vigor and stand density, and sediment plumes at the toe of the slopes tested.  With the heavier applications there was no visible erosion or sedimentation.
During my trainings and travels throughout the years many people have questioned or commented on the perceived fact that BFMs were NOT good for grass establishment.  This was especially true when Earth Guard first came out and it was observed that the “spray-on blanket” formed a rather rigid shell over the soil.  Not sure exactly how the rumor, (or is it factual?), got started, but none-the-less, the rumor was that BFMs when applied at the recommended rate of 4000 lbs/ac could/would stifle seedling germination.
Now let me point out that besides the replicated plots testing hydromulches, we also built one plot with a 2” thick Compost Blanket.  Just like the other plots we prepped the soil, added seed (20#/ac rate), added mychorrizae (AM 120 at 20#/ac rate) THEN cover with compost.  We did this on Friday and on Saturday a friend asked if I would be stifling the seed by covering it with 2” of compost?  Hmmm, I worried about this all night.
The next day I carefully divided the COMPOST PLOT in half and left one half with seed under and carefully raked some seed into the upper surface on the other half.
Now, look at the picture below showing the Compost Blanket Plot.
It is the one that is so lush and vigorous!!  Also, I cannot ascertain any difference between the seed-under and seed-on-top treatments.  Hmmmm??  Compost doesn’t behave like wood mulch AT ALL.  It doesn’t wash away, it doesn’t erode, it doesn’t stifle growth.  Oh, it does’t release N to surrounding water ways.  Hmmmm?

 

Check out our “Shasta College HydroMulch Trials: Does the Application Rate od 4,536kg/ha (4,000lbs/acre) of HydroMulch Inhibit Native Grass Germination and Establisment?” Project was performed by Tara Petti and John McCullah of Salix Applied Earthcare with the help of Henry A. Green of Shasta College.

Click Here to read up on the Study!

Pictures of Project are below!

*John applying the compost*

*Compost Plot Buliding December 2008*

*Compost After Huge Storm*

*Plots After Several Storms*

*Plots After Fours Months of Application*

*April 2009 Outcome*

 

What is Live Siltation you ask?

  First, here is a typical drawing of the BMP:

(Referenced: McCullah, J.A. 2004. ESenSS software. Salix Applied Earthcare. Redding, CA.)

Still unsure?

Live Siltation (also known as Vertical Brush Layering) is a revegetation technique used to secure the toe of a streambank, trap sediments, and create fish rearing habitat. The system can be constructed as a living or a non-living brushy system at the water’s edge.This is a very effective and simple conservation method using local plant materials. This technique is particularly valuable for providing immediate cover and fish habitat while other revegetation plantings become established. The protruding branches provide roughness, slow velocities, and encourage deposition of sediment. The depositional areas are then available for natural recruitment of native riparian vegetation.

Is Live Siltation a BMP that can only be utilized as it’s own whole?

Not only is this an effective BMP on its own, it can be utilized with different techniques and materials to sustain its abilities overtime. Live siltation techniques can be constructed in combination with rock toes, Rootwad Revetments, Coconut Fiber Rolls, Live Fascines, and Brush Mattresses. (more on these to come in furture blogs).

What materials are needed to make Live Siltation a Success?

Specific materials are needed to secure the construction of this particular BMP: Natural stone, willow wattles, logs or root wad revetments. The live siltation will require live branches of shrub willows 1-1.5 m (3.5–5 ft) in length. The branches should be dormant, and need to have the side branches still attached, for continued growth of the natural material. Any woody plant material, such as alder, can be installed for a non-living system.

What does Live Siltation acutally look like out in the Field?

Here is a Case Study of Live Siltation on the Belly River in Alberta, Canada 2012.

As you can see in the picture above, the water it at a lower rusing point, making installation of this method easier to construct, with the water’s edge not at your feet. This also, gives the plant materials to establish their placement within the dirt/rock (roots growing out making secure pacement within the ground), before battleing again the river’s current.

Why would one choose Live Siltation instead of another BMP?

This is a very effective and simple conservation method using local plant materials. This technique is particularly valuable for providing immediate cover and fish habitat while other revegetation plantings become established. The protruding branches provide roughness, slow velocities, and encourage deposition of sediment. The depositional areas are then available for natural recruitment of native riparian vegetation.

What construction needs to occur to secure proper layout of Live Siltation?

You will construct a V-shaped trench at the annual high water (AHW) level, with hand tools or a backhoe (for bigger projects). Excavate a trench so that it parallels the toe of the streambank and is approximately 0.6 m (2 ft) deep. Lay a thick layer of willow branches in the trench so that 1/3 of the length of the branches is above the trench and the branches angle out toward the stream. Place a minimum of 40 willow branches per m (12 branches per ft) in the trench.

Backfill over the branches with a gravel/soil mix and secure the top surface with large washed gravel, bundles/coir logs, or carefully placed rocks. Both the upstream and downstream ends of the live siltation construction need to transition smoothly into a stable streambank to reduce the potential for the system to wash out. More that one row of live siltation can be installed. A living and growing siltation system typically is installed at AHW. A non-living system can be constructed below AHW during low water levels. If it is impossible to dig a trench, the branches can be secured in place with logs, armor rock, bundles made from wattles, or coir logs.

**Note:This technique may be used for velocities up to 2 m/sec (6.6 ft/sec), but velocities should be at least 0.25 m/sec (0.8 ft/sec) for the system to function properly.**

What kind of maintenance/monitoring of this project is needed after completion?

During the first year, the installation should be checked for failures after all 1-year return interval and higher flows, and repaired as necessary. During summer months of the first year, ensure that cuttings are not becoming dehydrated.

Are there any common reasons why implementing Live Siltation has failed?

Cuttings will not promote siltation as well if not located near to or close at the water’s edge. If located further up the bank, cuttings may dry out, and will only trap sediments and slow velocities during high flows. Cuttings may not grow well if not handled properly prior to installation.

Still have questions?

Feel free to leave comments with questions/feedback or e-mail us @ info@sailxaec.com

Thanks for reading!

The Dirt Time Team

While we were clearing out a bunch of unneeded files, clumping up our computers’ life lines, we have stumbled across many of our old advertisments as a company, before and after Dirt Time Videos hitting the market!

 

Thanks for reading!

– John

 

Check this out! Bioengineering Software and Manuals!!!

Brought to you by Salix Applied Earthcare!

 

Month of June’s Spotlight Feature

ESenSS: Environmentally-Sensitive Streambank Stabilization Manual w/ Disc

 

This manual contains 44 different channel and bank protection techniques in the categories of:

  •    River Training
  •    Bank Armor and Protection
  •    Riparian Buffer and Stream Corridor Opportunities
  •    Slope Stabilization

Someone who would be interested in ESenSS:

Watershed hydrologists, highway engineers, soil conservationists, biologists, restoration ecologists, and anyone like yourself who could utilize this tool in restoring stream and river systems, white protecting property and structures with the latest techniques.

Each year, human activity and infrastructure places a higher impact on our surrounding environment. ESenSS includes increased knowledge of “soft” practices that provide engineers with the ability to restore ecological health and strength within the infrastructures that are so critical and important to human society.

ESenSS is user-friendly, with easy to read descriptions of the latest techniques used.

Detailed Auto-Cad drawings with reasoning behind techniques!

Colored, informative pictures on specific case studies with responsive outcomes!

ESenSS also includes the technique-selection software, “Greenbank,” which is an innovative program for selecting and ranking appropriate stabilization and protection techniques based on a whole suite of site-specific conditions.

For more information on this product ESenSS and more, visit our online store

at  WatchYourDirtStore.com .

Thanks for reading! : )

– The Dirt Time Team

Select your currency
USD United States (US) dollar